United States v. Gilmore

In the course of a hotly contested divorce, the taxpayer had incurred substantial legal fees in defending against his wife's claim to ownership of a controlling interest in the family business.

Accordingly, he sought to deduct some of these fees for the "conservation ... of property held for the production of income."

Following its earlier decision in Lykes v. United States, the Supreme Court sustained the Commissioner in disallowing the deduction as a "family" expense under § 262.

[1] The Court reasoned that the deductibility of legal fees depends upon the origin of the litigated claim rather than upon the potential consequences of success or failure to the taxpayer's income status.

Since the origin of the litigation was to be found in the taxpayer's marital difficulties, no deduction was allowable.