A contractor had been hired to furnish stone to the United States for a building, as well as to saw, cut, and dress it, all as "required".

Suspensions of work involved the examination of the building's foundation and the stone by several commissions.

The Court held that the contractor could recover damages for the enforced suspensions of, and delays in, the work by the United States.

[1] As a side item, the Court held a contract to furnish "all of the dimension stone that may be required in the construction" of a building does not include dimension stone used in "the approaches or steps leading up into the building".

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.