[3] In 1948, Swarup, who used to work for an anti-communist think-tank, convinced Goel to denounce communism and soon, both of them embraced nationalism in their way to hardliner Hindutva politics, whilst being actively sympathized by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

[6] Voice of India is associated with numerous journalists, historians, social commentators and academics such as Arun Shourie, David Frawley, Shrikant Talageri, Francois Gautier, Harsh Narain, Subhash Kak, Koenraad Elst, and N. S. Rajaram; nearly all of whom advocate for Hindu nationalism in varying ways and self-identify as Bauddhik Kshatriyas ("intellectual warriors").

[9] Witzel has described the affiliated writers to be part of a "closely knit, self-adulatory group that churned out long identical passages, copied in cottage industry fashion".

[4][8] Social services by Christian Missionary groups are deemed as a camouflage for their ultimate intent of baptizing people from other faiths and advocacy for secession.

[4] History of Hindu holocaust at the hands of Islamic invaders is prominently featured[9] and conversions to Hinduism are heavily advocated for liberation from the prison-houses of these Abrahamic religions.

[11] In contrast, Hinduism is regarded as the very representative of Indian-ness, which had supposedly sought to create a cultural empire rather than an imperialist military driven one.

[3] Concepts of Sarva Dharma Sama Bhava—that all religions are equally true and lead to the same end, are rejected as anti-Hindu school of thought.

[15] Bergunder deems these non-scholarly revisionist attempts as a tool to fulfill their broader ideological agenda of rejecting the subaltern discourse.

[6] Indologists Michael Witzel and Steve Farmer writes:[16]In the past few decades, a new kind of history has been propagated by a vocal group of Indian writers, few of them trained historians, who lavishly praise and support each other's works.

[...] Whole publishing firms, such as the Voice of India and Aditya Prakashan, are devoted to propagating their ideas.Academics and intellectuals who disagree with the VOI scholarship are often branded as negationists, who suffer from Hindu cowardice and thus seek to conceal or whitewash facts.