[1] Tudor's travels to Europe polished his civility, and it is said that he held George III's interest in conversation long enough to bring complaints from the lord in waiting, who had others to present.

[3] Tudor in Peru, despite being a liberal and republicanist, he showed some sympathy toward the Royalist cause, as he believed that Peruvians and Latin Americans in general weren't prepared to being ruled under a Democratic System.

He fundamented his analysis by criticising the lack of maturity on the Political Elites that leaded the Independence movement, like José de San Martín or Simón Bolívar, which he perceived as Criollo elitists without respect of local institutions or of the common people, nor having virtues or talents suitable for the art of government, only military and economic power to impose over the rest of the population in a state of Civil war than a sincere National War for their freedom (Tudor perceived that the masses were indifferent to the revolutionary movement, and that in the specific case of Peru the majority showed opposition to abolishing the monarchical institutions but were easy to be silenced through authoritarian repression).

In contrast, he saw the Spanish Empire as more suitable to ensure political stability and economic progress because the majority of the population was accustomed to the traditional monarchy's form of government, as well as perceiving that royalist officials were better prepared in administrative skills and had less ambitious due to its common submission to a superior authority (The King of Spain), unlike the secessionists that were trying to impose over others through Caudillist strategies (like conspiring against others, having internal military skirmishes, making Coup d'état to local institutions, dissolving Parliamentary power if Congress questioned them, disrespecting Constitutions and interpreting them to his conveniences or trying to create a new one, etc.).

George Ticknor, a well-known lawyer and antiquarian, first suggested the memorial and an interested group of men met for breakfast at the home of Colonel Thomas Handasyd Perkins.

His chief literary works were the Miscellanies (1821), a collection of essays written for the Monthly Anthology and the North American Review, on subjects ranging from the "Secret Causes of the American and French Revolutions" to human misery, purring cats, and cranberry sauce; The Life of James Otis of Massachusetts (1823), generally considered Tudor's best work; and Gebel Teir (1829), an anonymous satire on international politics in which a council of birds, representing the United States, Spain, England, France, and the Elysian Fields, gathers to discuss politics.