1921 Tour de France

The Belgians dominated the entire race, partly due to the absence of the French Pélissier brothers, who were on bad terms with the Tour organisation.

Scieur's victory was largely uncontested; Hector Heusghem came close after the sixth stage, but lost time later.

The 1920 Tour de France had been dominated by Belgian cyclists, who won twelve of the fifteen stages, and the top seven of the overall classification.

[2] Two veteran cyclists who did join the race were Ernest Paul and Lucien Pothier, both forty years old.

[5] The winner of 1920, Philippe Thys, was the dominant stage racer of the time, but he was recovering from an illness and could not compete for the victory.

[6] The economic impact of World War I was still not over, so as in the previous years there were not sponsored teams, but the cycling companies had bundled their forces under the nick La Sportive.

This troubled the Tour organiser and newspaper owner Henri Desgrange, who sanctioned cyclists that were not combative enough in his view.

Hector Heusghem took off on the Tourmalet, reached the top there first, rode solo over the Aspin and the Peyresourde and finished with a 24-minute margin.

[6][13] Although the stage was won by an unsponsored cyclist from the second class, Félix Sellier, this did not help for the general classification, as Scieur and Heusghem still finished together.

The final general classification, calculated by adding the stages times, was won by Léon Scieur, who received 15.000 Francs.

The French press and audience did not like this, and wanted the brothers Pélissier, who did not join because of a fight with the Tour organisers, to enter the race again.

Léon Scieur during the 1921 Tour de France, which he won
Black and white image of cyclists on a sandy road.
Léon Scieur , the overall winner of the 1921 Tour de France .
Henri Colle and Charles Parel drinking a beer in a tavern in Dalstein in 1921.