The aortogram was previously considered the gold standard test for the diagnosis of aortic dissection,[1] with a sensitivity of up to 80% and a specificity of about 94%.

[2] It is especially poor in the diagnosis of cases where the dissection is due to hemorrhage within the media without any initiating intimal tear.

The disadvantages of the aortogram are that it is an invasive procedure and it requires the use of iodinated contrast material.

[3] Aortography has largely been replaced by the diagnostic tools of MRI, CT, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) all of which have high sensitivities.

[4] TEE is favored in emergency situations, as it is relatively non-invasive and a rapid procedure (more so than MRI, which can take hours).