[2] The fourth essential claim comprising contextual integrity gives privacy its ethical standing and allows for the evolution and alteration of informational norms, often due to novel sociotechnical systems.
The "contexts" of contextual integrity are social domains, intuitively, health, finance, marketplace, family, civil and political, etc.
Examples of transmission principles include consent, coerced, stolen, buying, selling, confidentiality, stewardship, acting under the authority of a court with a warrant, and national security.
Consider the norm: "US residents are required by law to file tax returns with the US Internal Revenue Service containing information, such as, name, address, SSN, gross earnings, etc.
As a conceptual framework, contextual integrity has been used to analyze and understand the privacy implications of socio-technical systems on a wide array of platforms (e.g.
[6] The privacy concerns induced by the collection, dissemination and use of personal data via smartphones have received a large amount of attention from different stakeholders.
[7] Contextual integrity has been widely referred to when trying to understand the privacy concerns of the objective data flow traces.
[8] Lin et al. demonstrated multiple problematic personal data use cases due to the violation of users' expectations.
Both iOS and Android are using a permission system to help developers manage their access to sensitive resources (e.g. geolocation, contact list, user data, etc.)