Based on this premise, Van Dun argues that every natural person (individual) has a lawful claim on his life, freedom and property.

In his view, Western positive law systems reduce people to human resources, artificial persons with merely legal status.

Van Dun claims that the correct interpretation of the non-aggression principle (NAP) is praxeological rather than physical, because property is a "means of action".

[citation needed] This implies that it's not necessarily only the last action in the chain of social causations that is unlawful.

Consider the following examples: The freedom before property interpretation of the NAP is not widely accepted within the libertarian community.