The remains are dated to approximately 1.75 million years, and consist of fragmented parts of a lower mandible (which still holds thirteen teeth, as well as unerupted wisdom teeth), an isolated maxillary molar, two parietal bones, and twenty-one finger, hand, and wrist bones.

The Leakey team and others argued that, due expanded cranial capacity,[4] gnathic reduction, relatively small post-canine teeth (compared to Paranthropus boisei),[7] Homo-like pattern of craniofacial development,[8] and a precision grip in the hand fragments (which indicated the ability for tool use), set OH 7 apart as a transitional species between Australopithecus africanus and Homo erectus.

The Leakey team announced the new species Homo habilis in the April 1964 issue of Nature,[9] igniting debate among the anthropology community which lasted through the 1970s.

As early as May 1964, Kenneth Oakley and Bernard Campbell had raised concerns about the Leakey team's findings with their own publication in Nature, and in July of that same year Sir Wilfrid Le Gros Clark bluntly stated his hope that H. habilis "will disappear as rapidly as he came.

"[1] The controversy and bias against the newly named species lead some anthropologists to refer to H. habilis as Australopithecus habilis or assign associated fossil remains to other Homo species, a trend that continued long after Le Gros Clark's death in 1971.