Repeatedly from October 2012 (date of publication of a highly publicized article by Gilles-Eric Séralini on GMOs),[9] Paul Deheuvels, the only statistician within the academy, was the only academician to publicly support Séralini's statistical approach,[10] despite being overruled by a communiqué from six academies – science, medicine, technology, pharmacy, agriculture{etc. }
G.-E. Seralini's article was republished, in a more complete form, in 2014, in the journal Environmental Science Europe (part of the Springer Group), after new expert opinions that did not call into question either its content or its conclusions.
After the disclosure of the "Monsanto Papers",[11] the Seralini case[12][circular reference] was examined by CRIGEN,[13] which showed that the action taken against G.-E. Seralini had been organized underhand by industrial lobbies, without any objective scientific reference.
He also expressed his opposition to the theory of the anthropogenic origin of global warming – in particular by supporting the Club de l'horloge's award of the Lysenko Prize 2010 to Jean Jouzel.
[14][15][16] Rather, it agrees with the arguments of academician Vincent Courtillot to establish that human activity only has a marginal influence on climate change.