[6][7] Taras Kuzio writing for the Europe-Asia Studies in 2018 said that Applebaum's book follows in the footsteps of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), but benefits from improved access to Soviet archives.

[1] Stephen G. Wheatcroft writing for Contemporary European History, states that, right from the beginning, Applebaum indicates that she thinks that the famine was a result of someone's mentality and her objective is to find out who to blame for it.

Wheatcroft says that her view conforms to "an increasingly popular trend in Soviet history to ignore or oversimplify complex economic explanations and to reduce everything to moral judgments".

He additionally criticized Applebaum for her treatment of grain availability in Ukraine, which, according to Wheatcroft, "epitomizes the dangers of misunderstanding the [archival] data" and for other "factual[ly] incorrect" information.

[7] Christophe Guilluy states that "the treatment of the famine itself ... is moving and largely convincing", but that "the book's weakness is the historical framework into which Applebaum seeks to place the events", which suffers from "nationally centered narratives".