Talk:Chiapas

I know that the EZLN is attempting to set up autonomous municipalities, but i don't know about this federal state idea.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.244.10.221 (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] First, college anthropology papers and encyclopedia articles generally have different purposes, audiences, and styles, so copy/pasting from one to the other is seldom effective.

The parts about the Zapatistas and Marcos are far too long for the general page about Chiapas, and should be NPOV-ized, and slimmed down.

jacobolus (t) 21:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply] Should the Chiapas Media Project be included in the "Social development policies" section?

Molibdeno (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Should this article have a flag inside the infobox?

(CC) Tbhotch™ 20:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] It's fine that you have a source and it's from some university's passion project, but it's rather patently wrong.

It's also probably worth mentioning that chia isn't a proper name: it's literally just "oily" or "oilseed".

In any case, the one thing that seems certain is the current etymology this page is claiming and spreading to other sources in a vicious cycle is wrong as stated.