Thus, more timely range correction information would be available for each satellite, resulting in increased horizontal accuracy.
[citation needed] A 1996 evaluation using a PLGR (a 5-channel L2 GPS receiver) found no clear advantage to using WAGE in its then-current configuration.
[citation needed] However, the specifications information for the Defense Advanced GPS Receiver, which has replaced the PLGR, lists its WAGE accuracy as better than 4.82 m, 95% Horizontal.
[citation needed] Modern receivers & atomic clocks on a chip will also outperform WAGE.
[citation needed] There is a push for WAGE users to upgrade to Talon NAMATH or move them to using P(Y) alone.