Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state court's conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts.

[1] Having thus disposed of the claim, the Court declined to decide the issues the petition raised about interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.

[2] This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court.

As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.