Pro se legal representation in the United States

[1] In San Diego, for example, the number of divorce filings involving at least one pro se litigant rose from 46% in 1992 to 77% in 2000, in Florida from 66% in 1999 to 73% in 2001.

[1] California reports in 2001 that over 50% of family matters filings in custody and visitation are by pro se litigants.

73, 92, enacted by the First Congress and signed by President Washington one day before the Sixth Amendment was proposed, provided that "in all the courts of the United States, the parties may plead and manage their own causes personally or by the assistance of counsel.

The U.S. Judiciary Act, the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, addresses the rights of the self-represented litigant in several places.

Laws and organizations charged with regulating judicial conduct may also affect pro se litigants.

[8] The California rules allow for accommodating mistakes by a pro se litigant that would otherwise result in a dismissal, if the case is otherwise merited.

[13] A 2011 report from the Federal Judicial Center found 37 of the 94 district courts allow pro se litigants to use ECF.

[16] The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled that a "nonlawyer may not sign and file a notice of appeal on behalf of a corporation.

Requiring a lawyer to represent a corporation in filing the notice does not violate the guarantee that any suitor may prosecute or defend a suit personally.

[20] Another situation in which appearance through counsel is often required is in a case involving the executor or personal administrator of a probate estate.

[23][24] Some lawyers, such as University of Chicago Law School professor Will Baude, have argued that the rule might not be legally valid, and could be challenged by a litigant who might want to appear pro se.

"[35][36] 54% of judges responding to a Federal Judicial Conference survey use videoconferences for prisoner pro se hearings.

[43][44] Also, ABA Legal Needs Study shows that 45% of pro se believe that "Lawyers are more concerned with their own self promotion than their client's best interest.

Pro se appearances may also delay the trial proceedings and enhance the possibility of a mistrial and a subsequent appeal.

Brandon Moon is an example of an unsuccessful pro se litigant who became successful when his case was taken by a lawyer.

As the court noted, the various circuits had previously agreed in various rulings "that a pro se litigant who is not a lawyer is not entitled to attorney's fees".

One district court found that this policy does not prevent a pro se attorney from recovering fees paid for consultations with outside counsel.

[52][53] In the case of Fox v. Vice, U.S. Supreme Court held that reasonable attorneys' fees could be awarded to the defendant under 42 U.S.C.

[39] Many pro se resources come from these sources: local courts, which may offer limited self-help assistance;[58] public interest groups such as the American Bar Association, which sponsors reform and promotes resources for self-help[citation needed]; and commercial services, which sell pre-made forms allowing self-represented parties to have formally correct documents.

Their A2J Author Project is a software tool that empowers those from the courts, legal services programs and educational institutions to create guided interviews resulting in document assembly, electronic filing and data collection.

[75] The system, managed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, allows lawyers and self-represented clients to obtain documents entered in the case much faster than regular mail.

[77] Google Scholar is the biggest database of full text state and federal courts decisions that can be accessed without charge.

The Posner Center of Justice was later dissolved in 2019 after the number of assistance requests from pro se litigants overwhelmed the available staff.