Later, in 2019, Batya Friedman and David Hendry wrote a book on this topic called "Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination".
[13] Friedman and Hendry account seventeen methods, including their main purpose, an overview of its function as well as key references:[5] Two commonly cited criticisms are critiques of the heuristics of values on which VSD is built.
[40] Wessel Reijers and Bert Gordijn have built upon the criticisms of Le Dantec et alia and Manders-Huits that the value heuristics of VSD are insufficient given their lack of moral commitment.
[42] This criticism is predicated on the self-learning and opaque artificial intelligence techniques like those stemming from machine learning and, as a consequence, the unforeseen or unforeseeable values or disvalues that may emerge after the deployment of an AI system.
Steven Umbrello and Ibo van de Poel propose a modified VSD approach that uses the Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG)[43] factors as norms to translate abstract philosophical values into tangible design requirements.