There are additional subtle and some imperfectly understood rates of change in both the lunar and solar cycles.
An eclipse cycle constructed by Hipparchus is described in Ptolemy's Almagest IV.2: For from the observations he set out he [Hipparchus] shows that the smallest constant interval defining an ecliptic period in which the number of months and the amount of [lunar] motion is always the same, is 126007 days plus 1 equinoctial hour.
This period is a multiple of a Babylonians unit of time equal to one eighteenth of a minute (3+1/3 seconds), which in sexagesimal is 0;0,0,8,20 days.
(The true length of the month, 29.53058885 days, comes to 29;31,50,7,12 in sexagesimal, so the Babylonian value was correct to the nearest 3+1/3-second unit.)
By comparing his own eclipse observations with Babylonian records from 345 years earlier, he could verify the accuracy of the various periods that the Chaldean astronomers used.
[citation needed] The Hipparchic eclipse cycle is made up of 25 inex minus 21 saros periods.
[3] It corresponds to: There are other eclipse intervals that also have the properties desired by Hipparchus, for example an interval of 81.2 years (four of the 251-month cycles, or 19 inex minus 26 saros) which is even closer to a whole number of anomalistic months (1076.00056), and almost equally close to a half-integer number of draconic months (1089.5366).
An exceptionally accurate eclipse cycle from this point of view is one of 1154.5 years (43 inex minus 5 saros), which is much closer to a whole number of anomalistic months (15303.00005) than the interval of Hipparchus.