Biblical scholar Hermann von Soden observed that the manuscript preserved the division in pages and lines of its uncial parent.
[7][3][5] The copyist appears to leave lower parts of pages blank so as to begin the next section, therefore harmonising with the uncial parent.
[4] The manuscript has been corrected many times, either by erasurs or marginal notations, which appear to have been done by the initial copyist and another corrector.
[5] Biblical scholar J. Rendel Harris remarked that he did not "ever remember to have examined or collated so impant a m[anu]s[cript] as this.
"[5]: 35 The Greek text of the codex is considered a representative of the late Alexandrian text-type, with some Byzantine readings.
[9] Biblical scholar Kurt Aland placed it in Category II of his New Testament manuscript classification system.