When that situation occurs over an entire element of a structure, as is often the case for thin plates, the stress analysis is considerably simplified, as the stress state can be represented by a tensor of dimension 2 (representable as a 2×2 matrix rather than 3×3).
[1] A related notion, plane strain, is often applicable to very thick members.
Plane stress typically occurs in thin flat plates that are acted upon only by load forces that are parallel to them.
In certain situations, a gently curved thin plate may also be assumed to have plane stress for the purpose of stress analysis.
This is the case, for example, of a thin-walled cylinder filled with a fluid under pressure.
In such cases, stress components perpendicular to the plate are negligible compared to those parallel to it.
[1] In other situations, however, the bending stress of a thin plate cannot be neglected.
One can still simplify the analysis by using a two-dimensional domain, but the plane stress tensor at each point must be complemented with bending terms.
That is, there is Cartesian coordinate system in which the stress tensor has the form For example, consider a rectangular block of material measuring 10, 40 and 5 cm along the
direction, by pairs of opposite forces with magnitudes 10 N and 20 N, respectively, uniformly distributed over the corresponding faces.
The stress tensor inside the block will be More generally, if one chooses the first two coordinate axes arbitrarily but perpendicular to the direction of zero stress, the stress tensor will have the form and can therefore be represented by a 2 × 2 matrix, In certain cases, the plane stress model can be used in the analysis of gently curved surfaces.
For example, consider a thin-walled cylinder subjected to an axial compressive load uniformly distributed along its rim, and filled with a pressurized fluid.
The internal pressure will generate a reactive hoop stress on the wall, a normal tensile stress directed perpendicular to the cylinder axis and tangential to its surface.
The cylinder can be conceptually unrolled and analyzed as a flat thin rectangular plate subjected to tensile load in one direction and compressive load in another other direction, both parallel to the plate.
If one dimension is very large compared to the others, the principal strain in the direction of the longest dimension is constrained and can be assumed as constant, that means there will be effectively zero strain along it, hence yielding a plane strain condition (Figure 7.2).
In this case, though all principal stresses are non-zero, the principal stress in the direction of the longest dimension can be disregarded for calculations.
Thus, allowing a two dimensional analysis of stresses, e.g. a dam analyzed at a cross section loaded by the reservoir.
term arises from the Poisson's effect.
However, this term can be temporarily removed from the stress analysis to leave only the in-plane terms, effectively reducing the analysis to two dimensions.
and all other stress components equal to zero (Figure 8.1).
From static equilibrium of an infinitesimal material element at
direction, is given by: These equations indicate that in a plane stress or plane strain condition, one can determine the stress components at a point on all directions, i.e. as a function of
It is important to remember that we are considering a unit area of the infinitesimal element in the direction parallel to the
The principal directions (Figure 8.3), i.e., orientation of the planes where the shear stress components are zero, can be obtained by making the previous equation for the shear stress
Thus we have: and we obtain This equation defines two values
The same result can be obtained by finding the angle
, or minimum and maximum normal stresses
the infinitesimal element is oriented in the direction of the principal planes, thus the stresses acting on the rectangular element are principal stresses:
as a function of the principal stresses can be determined by making
(Figure 8.3): Then the minimum shear stress