Root test

In mathematics, the root test is a criterion for the convergence (a convergence test) of an infinite series.

It depends on the quantity where

are the terms of the series, and states that the series converges absolutely if this quantity is less than one, but diverges if it is greater than one.

It is particularly useful in connection with power series.

The root test was developed first by Augustin-Louis Cauchy who published it in his textbook Cours d'analyse (1821).

[1] Thus, it is sometimes known as the Cauchy root test or Cauchy's radical test.

For a series the root test uses the number where "lim sup" denotes the limit superior, possibly +∞.

Note that if converges then it equals C and may be used in the root test instead.

The root test states that: There are some series for which C = 1 and the series converges, e.g.

This test can be used with a power series where the coefficients cn, and the center p are complex numbers and the argument z is a complex variable.

The terms of this series would then be given by an = cn(z − p)n. One then applies the root test to the an as above.

Note that sometimes a series like this is called a power series "around p", because the radius of convergence is the radius R of the largest interval or disc centred at p such that the series will converge for all points z strictly in the interior (convergence on the boundary of the interval or disc generally has to be checked separately).

A corollary of the root test applied to a power series is the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem: the radius of convergence is exactly

taking care that we really mean ∞ if the denominator is 0.

The proof of the convergence of a series Σan is an application of the comparison test.

If for all n ≥ N (N some fixed natural number) we have

Hence Σan converges absolutely.

for infinitely many n, then an fails to converge to 0, hence the series is divergent.

Proof of corollary: For a power series Σan = Σcn(z − p)n, we see by the above that the series converges if there exists an N such that for all n ≥ N we have equivalent to for all n ≥ N, which implies that in order for the series to converge we must have

for all sufficiently large n. This is equivalent to saying so

Now the only other place where convergence is possible is when (since points > 1 will diverge) and this will not change the radius of convergence since these are just the points lying on the boundary of the interval or disc, so Example 1: Applying the root test and using the fact that

[2] Example 2: The root test shows convergence because This example shows how the root test is stronger than the ratio test.

The ratio test is inconclusive for this series as if

Root tests hierarchy[3][4] is built similarly to the ratio tests hierarchy (see Section 4.1 of ratio test, and more specifically Subsection 4.1.4 there).

with positive terms we have the following tests for convergence/divergence.

th iterate of natural logarithm, i.e.

is large, can be presented in the form (The empty sum is assumed to be 0.)

, then we have From this, From Taylor's expansion applied to the right-hand side, we obtain: Hence, (The empty product is set to 1.)

The final result follows from the integral test for convergence.

This article incorporates material from Proof of Cauchy's root test on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.