In various sources, the name may be found spelled as Te’umman,[1] Teumann, or Te-Umman.
Cameron," believed him to have been the Tepti-Huban-Inshushinak mentioned in inscriptions, although this view has since fallen from favor.
On the one hand, D. T. Potts (2015) refers to Teumann as "apparently unrelated to either Urtak or Hubanhaltash II.
"[1] Likewise, Boederman's Cambridge Ancient History refers to the accession of Teumman as a "dynastic upset.
"[2] On the other hand, M. Rahim Shayegan claims that "Te'umman seems to have been the brother of two of his royal predecessors (Huban-Haltaš II and Urtak).