The FWC also creates modern awards that apply to most sectors of work, numbering 150 in 2024, with minimum pay scales, and better rights for overtime, holidays, paid leave, and superannuation for a pension in retirement.
Though the stockade was broken, and its leaders killed or arrested and put on trial, juries acquitted all, the gold licence fee was replaced with an export duty, and miners won the right to vote in the Victorian Legislative Assembly.
[8] At Australia's federation in 1901, the Constitution section 51(xxxv) empowered the making of "laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to... conciliation and arbitration for the prevention and settlement of industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of any one state".
[17] Australian workers were among the world's wealthiest by the 1980s, but Parliament decided to follow US and UK models to reduce sectoral collective bargaining and awards,[18] believing that it halted "productive innovation".
[20] This approach was codified in the Industrial Relations Act 1988, where industry-wide awards only provided a minimum safety net, enterprise bargaining would create certified agreements for higher wages, and unions and employers could take collective action including strikes, if certain conditions were fulfilled.
[21] The Industrial Relations Reform Act 1993 added provisions on unfair dismissal, and that non-union workplaces could also make collective agreements, if approved by a special majority, there was "no disadvantage" compared to awards, and workers were adequately informed about the bargain.
[27] This basic structure was not touched by the Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison governments, although wages and standards continued to decline through lack of enforcement, growing casualization, and hostile judicial decisions.
With the Albanese government, a series of reforms, such as the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill, aimed to raise protection, since Australian labour rights remained significantly below European and wealthier countries' standards.
[30] A contract is a deal entered into by consent, and common law and statute set default rights, such as enough hours, a safe system of work, and sometimes good faith.
[36] However the scope of who has rights under the Fair Work Act 2009, including for award wages, paid holidays, collective bargaining, and job security, depends on the test for who is an employee, as opposed to an "independent contractor".
Historically, this distinction was based on the view that employees have systematically unequal bargaining power,[37] and therefore needed positive legal rights that would otherwise be lost in take-it-or-leave-it contracts that the employer imposed.
[38] The common law distinguished employees from the self-employed (who are responsible for their own rights, or fell back on the state), based on the employer's exercise of control, for instance over place or conditions of work.
"[46] By comparison, wealthier jurisdictions determine employee status and rights based on reality, bargaining power, and the purpose of the law, and disregard inconsistent contract terms.
[56] Further, in FWO v Valuair Ltd (No 2) the Federal Court held that Qantas could use its wholly owned subsidiary Jetstar, incorporated in New Zealand, to employ foreign workers to work in Australia on wages lower than Australian staff, undercutting the enterprise agreement.
Employee-like workers and road transport contractors may apply to the Fair Work Commission for a “Minimum Standard Order” or "Guideline", and make collective agreements with a digital labour platform.
FWA 2009 section 14 covers every "national system employer" that may be regulated by the federal constitution, and gaps were closed by all states referring their powers over industrial matters to the Commonwealth (except Western Australia).
[58] First, the Fair Work Commission sets a basic "national minimum wage" each year for all employees not covered by a specific "modern award", as a catch all safety net.
[123] Under section 228(1), the "good faith" requirements are that the FWC can make the employer and union meet at reasonable times, disclose relevant information, respond to proposals, genuinely consider them, refrain from capricious and unfair conduct, and recognise the other side's bargaining representatives.
[156] Secondary boycotts have been banned since 1977,[157] so that unions cannot take action in solidarity with workers in different workplaces, even where anti-productive competition is driving pay down in a race to the bottom across a whole sector.
[173] Equal treatment is a fundamental right in international law because it has been universally recognised that people should be judged by the content of their character, their skills and knowledge, and not irrelevant characteristics.
The grounds for a complaint are based on five groups of protected characteristics, namely (a) race, colour, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, (b) sex, sexual orientation, marital status, (c) age, (d) physical or mental disability, and (e) pregnancy,[180] family or carer responsibility.
The High Court accepted Qantas’ argument that being younger was an inherent requirement because regional aviation regulators restricted pilots over 60, meaning he could not fly internationally.
Similarly controversial, in X v Commonwealth the High Court held in 1999 that it was lawful to dismiss a member of the Australian Defence Forces who was HIV positive, even though he was asymptomatic, on the ground that the illness risked infection of other personnel (even though that it medically untrue).
For example, in Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd the Federal Court awarded $130,000 in compensation for persistent sexual slurs against the claimant, who was forced to resign from her job, up from $18,000 given at first instance.
[202] There have not yet been institutions to set aside a portion of the funds from Australia's natural resources for Indigenous Australian well-being, nor are there yet clear principles established to ensure that historic disadvantage is undone, as in South Africa, India, or Europe, through positive action.
The dominant view is that courts may find greater notice is warranted where the facts speak in favour, because statute's purpose is to create a floor of rights, not a ceiling, that common law may improve upon, not undercut.
[222] A dismissal will be "unfair" if it is "harsh, unjust or unreasonable", and according to the High Court in Byrne v Australian Airlines this includes the concept of the employer whose action "is disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct" of the employee.
[224] Under section 387, the Fair Work Commission should consider factors including the employee's capacity and conduct, notice given, an opportunity to respond to any allegation, representation given, warnings before dismissal, and the enterprise's size and HR specialists.
[228] By contrast in Fussell v Transport for NSW it was held fair to dismiss an employee who sent "an offensive image of his own anatomy" over Snapchat to a work colleague who he thought was a private friend - even though he immediately apologised.
[230] Under section 392, compensation is limited to 26 weeks' pay or half the high income threshold, regardless of the actual economic loss, distress or social cost of the dismissal.