Conservative temperature
It is derived from the potential enthalpy and is recommended under the TEOS-10 standard (Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater - 2010) as a replacement for potential temperature as it more accurately represents the heat content in the ocean.
[1][2] Conservative temperature was initially proposed by Trevor McDougall in 2003.
The motivation was to find an oceanic variable representing the heat content that is conserved during both pressure changes and turbulent mixing.
is not sufficient for this purpose, as the compression of a water parcel with depth causes an increase of the temperature despite the absence of any external heating.
can be used to combat this issue, as it is referenced to a specific pressure and so ignores these compressive effects.
In fact, potential temperature is a conservative variable in the atmosphere for air parcels in dry adiabatic conditions, and has been used in ocean models for many years.
[3] However, turbulent mixing processes in the ocean destroy potential temperature, sometimes leading to large errors when it is assumed to be conservative.
[4] By contrast, the enthalpy of the parcel is conserved during turbulent mixing.
However, it suffers from a similar problem to the in-situ temperature in that it also has a strong pressure dependence.
Instead, potential enthalpy is proposed to remove this pressure dependence.
Conservative temperature is then proportional to the potential enthalpy.
is the relative chemical potential of salt in seawater.
During a process that does not lead to the exchange of heat or salt, entropy and salinity can be assumed constant.
Therefore, taking the partial derivative of this relation with respect to pressure yields:
By integrating this equation, the potential enthalpy
Here the enthalpy and density are defined in terms of the three state variables: salinity, potential temperature and pressure.
is defined to be directly proportional to potential enthalpy.
It is rescaled to have the same units (Kelvin) as the in-situ temperature:
= 3989.24495292815 J kg−1K−1 is a reference value of the specific heat capacity, chosen to be as close as possible to the spatial average of the heat capacity over the entire ocean surface.
is the rate of dissipation, which is small compared to the other terms and can therefore be neglected.
is the material derivative with respect to the fluid flow
In order to show that potential enthalpy is conservative in the ocean, it must be shown that the first law of thermodynamics can be rewritten in conservation form.
Taking the material derivative of the equation of potential enthalpy yields:
It can be shown that the final two terms on the right-hand side of this equation are as small or even smaller than the dissipation rate discarded earlier[2][4] and the equation can therefore be approximated as:
Combining this with the first law of thermodynamics yields the equation:
Given that conservative temperature was initially introduced to correct errors in the oceanic heat content, it is important to compare the relative errors made by assuming that conservative temperature is conserved to those originally made by assuming that potential temperature is conserved.
These errors occur from non-conservation effects that are due to entirely different processes; for conservative temperature heat is lost due to work done by compression, whereas for potential temperature this is due to surface fluxes of heat and freshwater.
[3] It can be shown that these errors are approximately 120 times smaller for conservative temperature than for potential temperature, making it far more accurate as a representation of the conservation of heat in the ocean.
[1] Other developments in TEOS-10 include: Conservative temperature has been implemented in several ocean general circulation models such as those involved in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6).
[9] However, as these models have predominantly used potential temperature in previous generations, not all models have decided to switch to conservative temperature.
