Shapiro–Francia test

It was introduced by S. S. Shapiro and R. S. Francia in 1972 as a simplification of the Shapiro–Wilk test.

independent draws from a normal distribution.

, meaning that the second-lowest value in a sample of four draws from a normal distribution is typically about 0.297 standard deviations below the mean.

[2] Form the Pearson correlation coefficient between the

: Under the null hypothesis that the data is drawn from a normal distribution, this correlation will be strong, so

values will cluster just under 1, with the peak becoming narrower and closer to 1 as

If the data deviate strongly from a normal distribution,

[1] This test is a formalization of the older practice of forming a Q–Q plot to compare two distributions, with the

playing the role of the quantile points of the sample distribution and the

playing the role of the corresponding quantile points of a normal distribution.

is easier to compute, because it does not require that we form and invert the matrix of covariances between order statistics.

There is no known closed-form analytic expression for the values of

There, are however, several approximations that are adequate for most practical purposes.

[2] The exact form of the null distribution of

[1] Monte-Carlo simulations have shown that the transformed statistic

is nearly normally distributed, with values of the mean and standard deviation that vary slowly with

[3] Comparison studies have concluded that order statistic correlation tests such as Shapiro–Francia and Shapiro–Wilk are among the most powerful of the established statistical tests for normality.

[4] One might assume that the covariance-adjusted weighting of different order statistics used by the Shapiro–Wilk test should make it slightly better, but in practice the Shapiro–Wilk and Shapiro–Francia variants are about equally good.

In fact, the Shapiro–Francia variant actually exhibits more power to distinguish some alternative hypothesis.